ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND III ORS. Versus CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MAHARASHTRA LTD. (C.A. 14652/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 14652/2025

Case Record

C.A. 14652/2025

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND III ORS. Versus CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MAHARASHTRA LTD.

REGISTRAR

C.A.Direction to public body Civil appeals Delay Municipal law Taxation

10 PDF renditions· 10 distinct judicial orders· 9 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

PRINCIPAL COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/S CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MAHARASHTRA LTD. C.A. 14652/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010576372024. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 9 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 17 January 2025 to 26 February 2026.

On 17 January 2025 the order records: Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP as well as on the main matter.
On 4 April 2025 the order records: 1. We are informed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners – Revenue that a similar matter, i.e., Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No.57637/2024, arising out of the common impugned Judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, is pending with this Court in which notice has been i
On 16 April 2025 the order records: As per office report, Ld. Counsel for Petitioner has not filed spare copy in terms of Hon'ble Court's Order dated 17.1.2025 for service on respondents. As prayed, one week's time, is granted to file the same.
On 30 April 2025 the order records: Service is complete on sole respondent. Mr.Shubham Chandkheda, Ld. Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Mr. Kunal Cheema, Ld. Advocate -on-Record for sole respondent.
On 25 July 2025 the order records: Issue notice on the application seeking condonation of delay in filing the special leave petition as well as on the special leave petition. Tag the matter along with Diary No.57637/2024.
On 28 July 2025 the order records: Four weeks time is granted to sole respondent to file counter affidavit. After the expiry of four weeks, let the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
On 8 December 2025 the order records: 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted.
On 26 February 2026 the order records: Sole respondent has already filed counter affidavit. Process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

17 January 2025. Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP as well as on the main matter.
4 April 2025. 1. We are informed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners – Revenue that a similar matter, i.e., Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No.57637/2024, arising out of the common impugned Judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, is pending with this Court in which notice has been i
16 April 2025. As per office report, Ld. Counsel for Petitioner has not filed spare copy in terms of Hon'ble Court's Order dated 17.1.2025 for service on respondents. As prayed, one week's time, is granted to file the same.
30 April 2025. Service is complete on sole respondent. Mr.Shubham Chandkheda, Ld. Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Mr. Kunal Cheema, Ld. Advocate -on-Record for sole respondent.
9 May 2025. Tag with Special Leave Petition (civil) Diary No. 57637/2024.
25 July 2025. Issue notice on the application seeking condonation of delay in filing the special leave petition as well as on the special leave petition. Tag the matter along with Diary No.57637/2024.
28 July 2025. Four weeks time is granted to sole respondent to file counter affidavit. After the expiry of four weeks, let the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
8 December 2025. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted.
26 February 2026. Sole respondent has already filed counter affidavit. Process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Mr. Gopi Chand, Mrs. Pankhuri Srivastava, Mrs. Sushma Verma, Mr. Chinmayee Chandra, Mrs. Deepika Singh, Mr. Udai Khanna, Ms. Adya Jha, Mr. Pratyush Srivastava, Mr. Kamal Kishore, Ms. Madhulika Upadhyay Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Shubham Chandankhede, Mr. Kunal Cheema, Mr. J.d Mistri, Mr. Madhur Agrawal, Mr. Rushabha Tripathi, Mr. Rushabh Tripathi

Relief Sought & Granted

On 26 February 2026 the latest order on this record says: Sole respondent has already filed counter affidavit. Process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Direction to public body Civil appeals Delay Municipal law Taxation

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 26 Feb 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 26 Feb 2026

Next hearing

26 Feb 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 9 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 1 other files in the folder were left out.