- 22 September 2020. Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as also on the special leave petition(s), returnable in three weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
- 16 December 2020. The respondents have been served but none has put in appearance. Leave granted.
- 22 September 2022. Service is complete on respondent nos. 1 to 7 but none has entered appearance on their behalf. Respondent nos. 1 to 4, 14 to 18, 35,36,74 and 86 are duly represented.
- 14 November 2022. CA 4142/2020 Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 but none has entered appearance. CA 4145-4177/2020 Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, 14 to 18, 35, 36, 74 and 86 are duly represented.
- 2 January 2023. Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 to 7 but none has entered appearance. Respondent Nos.1-4, 14-18, 35, 36, 74 and 86 are duly represented.
- 5 April 2023. Service of notice is not complete upon Respondent No. 85. The said respondent is a minor and represented by Respondent No. 30. Service of notice upon Respondent No. 30 is complete. Since Respondent No. 30 is the natural guardian of the Respondent No. 85.
- 24 July 2023. Ms. R. Shase, learned counsel, states that the estate of deceased respondent No.61 is already represented, inasmuch as respondent No.60 is none other than her husband. She seeks time to file a memo stating to that effect. List after two weeks.
- 21 August 2023. Read the office report dated 18th August, 2023. In view of the submission made in Court that the respondent no. 61 (Pushpa Devi) has passed away leaving behind her husband respondent no.60 (Mahesh Chand) as the sole surviving heir, the appellant shall file amended memo of parties showing that the estate of deceased res
- 1 May 2025. 1) List after two weeks. (NIDHI AHUJA) (PREETI SAXENA) AR-cum-PS
- 11 September 2025. 1) The matters stand adjourned by two weeks as prayed for in the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty. (NIDHI AHUJA) (NIDHI WASON) AR-cum-PS
- 22 August 2026. The dispute between the parties has been referred for determination to the Special Lok Adalat. No settlement could be arrived at inter-se the parties. As such, list the matter(s) before the Court in due course.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Mr. G. Balaji, Mr Muthu Vel Palani, Mr. Muthuvel Palani M., Mr. Muthuvel Palani, Ms. R. Shase, Ms. Arzu Paul, Mr. Neeleshwar Pavani, Mr. Neele, Mr. Shiv Kumar, Ms. Vaishnavi, Mr. Vishal Meghwal Advocates — Respondents: Mr Vinod Chauhan, Mr Hari Singh, Mr Avadhesh Kumar Dubey, Mr N.B.V. Srinivasa, Mr Sandeep, Mr Sunil Prakash Pandey, Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Mr. Anshuman Bal, Mr. Arun Kumar Nagar, Mr. Manohar Naagar, Mr. Vikrant Mehta, Mr. Priya Rastogi
