ARVIND KUMAR AND ANR. Versus STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ANURAG OJHA , [IMPL], [HEARD BY: HON. DIPANKAR DATTA AND HON. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ.] MODIFICATION PARTIES INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT REJOINDER AFFIDAVIT (C.A. 8257/2026)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 8257/2026

Case Record

C.A. 8257/2026

ARVIND KUMAR AND ANR. Versus STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ANURAG OJHA , [IMPL], [HEARD BY: HON. DIPANKAR DATTA AND HON. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ.] MODIFICATION PARTIES INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT REJOINDER AFFIDAVIT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

28 PDF renditions· 28 distinct judicial orders· 23 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

ARVIND KUMAR & ORS.ETC. Versus STATE OF U.P. & ORS.ETC.. C.A. 8257/2026 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010062442023. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 23 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 3 March 2023 to 24 July 2026.

On 3 March 2023 the order records: Issue notice, returnable in two weeks. Dasti service, in addition to ordinary process, is permitted.
On 12 December 2023 the order records: IA No. 47306/2023 and 73237/2023 - Applications for intervention/impleadment stand allowed. The respondent No.5 shall file counter affidavit, if any, within a period of four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit shall be filed within a period of two weeks thereafter. In the meanwhile, the parties shall exchange pleadings.
On 13 November 2025 the order records: 1. We have heard learned senior counsel/counsel for the respective parties. 2. Hearing is on the verge of completion. However, before concluding hearing, we require the State of Uttar Pradesh to furnish the following particulars:
On 20 November 2025 the order records: 1. Status report filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh is taken on record. 2. It has been prayed that further 10 days' time may be given to answer query no. (c), as indicated in the previous order of 13th November, 2025.
On 10 December 2025 the order records: 1. A further status report dated 05.12.2025 has been filed by the respondent State of Uttar Pradesh. 2. Mr. Sen, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners in SLP 4012/2023 rightly points out that particulars of only first two petitioners have been furnished by the respondent-State and not the other petitione
On 25 February 2026 the order records: 1. Heard in part. 2. List these petitions on 12th March, 2026 at 03:50 p.m., subject to obtaining orders from the Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India.
On 19 May 2026 the order records: 1. Mr. S. R. Singh, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Uttar Pradesh has placed before us the instructions that he has received from the State in regard to filling up of the posts of vocational instructors in the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Training Institute. 2. On the date the impugned judgment and order
On 21 May 2026 the order records: 1. Leave granted. 2. Arguments concluded.

Issues Before Court

The primary issue that these appeals raise is: whether the 2014 Rules are bad for contravention of the executive directions dated 24 th July, 1996 vide which the Central Government required CITS certificate to be a mandatory essential qualification?

Procedural History

3 March 2023. Issue notice, returnable in two weeks. Dasti service, in addition to ordinary process, is permitted.
20 March 2023. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioners, matter stands adjourned for two weeks.
1 September 2023. Not to be deleted from the notified date i.e., on 06.10.2023.
6 October 2023. As per office report, service is incomplete on Respondent No.3 in SLP(C) No. 9685 of 2023 and Respondents No. 3 and 4 in SLP(C) No. 13648 of 2023. Three weeks time is granted to the Petitioners to complete the service on unserved respondents.
12 December 2023. IA No. 47306/2023 and 73237/2023 - Applications for intervention/impleadment stand allowed. The respondent No.5 shall file counter affidavit, if any, within a period of four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit shall be filed within a period of two weeks thereafter. In the meanwhile, the parties shall exchange pleadings.
23 April 2024. List on 09.07.2024. Liberty to move before the vacation Bench.
9 July 2024. Re-list for final hearing/disposal on the non-miscellaneous day in the week commencing 09.09.2024. In the meanwhile, the parties will be at liberty to complete the pleadings, including pleadings on the application(s) on which notice has been issued.
6 March 2025. Not to be deleted from the notified date i.e. 25th March, 2025.
28 March 2025. List the special leave petitions on 17th April, 2025.
17 April 2025. Relist the special leave petitions in the week commencing 21 st July, 2025 on a non miscellaneous day. (JATINDER KAUR) (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA) P.S. to REGISTRAR
30 July 2025. Not to be deleted from the date already notified i.e. 9th September, 2025. (JATINDER KAUR) (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA) P.S. to REGISTRAR
16 September 2025. Re-list the special leave petitions on 23rd September, 2025, high on board.
7 October 2025. 1. The petitions are heard in-part. 2. List the special leave petitions tomorrow i.e. on 8 th October, 2025 at 2:00 p.m.
8 October 2025. 1. The petitions are heard in-part. 2. Re-list the special leave petitions on 13th November, 2025 at 12:00 noon.
13 November 2025. 1. We have heard learned senior counsel/counsel for the respective parties. 2. Hearing is on the verge of completion. However, before concluding hearing, we require the State of Uttar Pradesh to furnish the following particulars:
20 November 2025. 1. Status report filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh is taken on record. 2. It has been prayed that further 10 days' time may be given to answer query no. (c), as indicated in the previous order of 13th November, 2025.
10 December 2025. 1. A further status report dated 05.12.2025 has been filed by the respondent State of Uttar Pradesh. 2. Mr. Sen, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners in SLP 4012/2023 rightly points out that particulars of only first two petitioners have been furnished by the respondent-State and not the other petitione
27 January 2026. 1. Re-list the special leave petitions on 25th February, 2026 at 12:00 noon. 2. If the petitioners wish to file any objection to the status report, they may do so on affidavit well in advance of the next date of hearing.
25 February 2026. 1. Heard in part. 2. List these petitions on 12th March, 2026 at 03:50 p.m., subject to obtaining orders from the Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India.
19 May 2026. 1. Mr. S. R. Singh, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Uttar Pradesh has placed before us the instructions that he has received from the State in regard to filling up of the posts of vocational instructors in the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Training Institute. 2. On the date the impugned judgment and order
21 May 2026. 1. Leave granted. 2. Arguments concluded.
24 July 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
24 July 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. R. Balasubramaniam, Mr. Sanjai Kumar Pathak, Mr. Ankur Sharma, Mr. Arvind Kumar Tripathi, Ms. Shashi Pathak, Mrs. Shashi Pathak, Ms. Parul Shukla, Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, Ms. Shreya Bhojnagarwala, Mr. Anupam Mishra, Mr. Jenis, Mr. Harikumar V. Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Mr. Badri Prasad Singh, Mr. Rajan Kumar Chaurasia, Mr. Purnendu Bajpai, Mr. Prashant Rawat, Mr. Amrish Kumar, Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Mr. Arijit Sarkar, Ms. Nabeela Jamil, Mr. Anurag Ojha, Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Mr. Gautam Barnwal

Relief Sought & Granted

On 21 May 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. Leave granted. 2. Arguments concluded.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 24 Jul 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 24 Jul 2026

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 23 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 5 other files in the folder were left out.