- 9 February 2018. The application for permission to appear and argue in person is allowed. Issue notice.
- 27 April 2018. Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 to 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 13 to 15, 18 to 23, 26, 27, 29 to 32, 34 and 36 to 40 but none has entered appearance. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.4, 9, 10, 12, 16, 24, 25, 28, 33 and 35 for filing counter affidavit.
- 4 July 2018. Regard being had to the letter circulated on behalf of the respondent no. 4, three weeks' time is granted for filing counter affidavit.
- 27 July 2018. Let this matter be listed before the Bench which is hearing W.P.(C)No.565 of 2012. The Registry is directed to do the needful.
- 22 November 2018. The petitioner who is appearing in person says that she would like to file an amended writ petition. Leave to file amended writ petition granted.
- 15 February 2019. Issue notice on the amended writ petition, returnable in four weeks. The respondents may file their reply/counter affidavit, if any, in the meantime.
- 26 April 2019. In view of the request made in the letter circulated on behalf of the respondent-State of Jharkand, the matter is adjourned by four weeks.
- 5 August 2019. Only 11 States, namely, States of Arunachal Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Goa, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Odisha, Punjab and Sikkim and 2 Union Territories (U.Ts.), namely, U.Ts. of Andaman and Nicobar Island and Lakshadweep have filed counter affidavit to the writ petition. Other States have not filed t
- 11 September 2019. Application for waiver of costs is taken on record, which is rejected. However, counter may be taken on record, within a week, subject to payment of costs as directed by this Court in the earlier order dated 05.08.2019.
- 17 September 2019. Cost to be paid to Supreme Court Legal Services Committee which shall be used for juvenile justice system.
- 20 September 2019. Taken on board. Two weeks' time is extended to file counter affidavit. Costs be paid to Supreme Court Legal Services Committee for utilization of juvenile justice issues.
- 9 September 2022. It is stated by Ms. Anuja Kapur, petitioner-in-person, that she wants to withdraw from the present case, but, as the issue involved is important and relevant, some other person would be henceforth appearing as a petitioner in the present Writ Petition. Let appropriate application, in this regard, be filed within a peri
- 14 November 2022. Mr. Ashwani Kumar Upadhyay, who appears in-person seeks permission to withdraw the present application and file a detailed application with particulars within a period of two weeks. In view of the statement made, the application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Anuja Kapur Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Aruna Mathur, Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Mr. Som Raj Choudhury, Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Ms. G. Indira, Mr. Abhishek Atrey, Ms. Mamta Singh, Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Mr. Edward Belho, Mr. Amit Kumar Singh
