- 21 July 2025. 1. The order impugned is an interlocutory order passed in an appeal emanating from grant of temporary injunction. The suit was instituted inter alia for declaring sale deed dated 28.05.2020 as null and void to the extent of 1/3rd share of the plaintiff; declaring Will dated 05.02.2013 as an outcome of fraud; declaring
- 18 September 2025. As sought two weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for respondent no.1 file counter affidavit. Despite service being complete, none has entered appearance for respondent nos. 2 to 7.
- 13 October 2025. 1. List in the 2nd week of January, 2026.
- 12 January 2026. 1. Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu, learned Sr. Advocate representing the petitioner suggests that his clients are willing to make an offer for a settlement and, therefore, the matter may be referred to mediation under the aegis of the Supreme Court Mediation Centre. Having regard to the above, the learned counsel is not avers
- 20 March 2026. 1. Leave granted. 2. List for hearing on 22.04.2026.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu, Mr. G. Balaji, Mr. Deepak Sharma, Ms. Divya, Mr. Neeleshwar Pavani, Ms. Arzu Paul, Ms. Vaishnavi, Mr. Shiva Kumar, Ms. Divya Narayanan, Mr. V.aravind, Mr. Shiv Kumar, Mr. Chitambaresh Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Shubham Saigal, Mrs. Madhavi Divan, Mr. Siddharth Jain, Ms. Shruti Mishra, Mr. Atharva Kotwal, Ms Madhavi Divan, Mr Siddharth Jain, Ms Shruti Mishra, Mr Ashish Shukla
