AMAR TANDON Versus GURMAIL SINGH SAINI AND ORS. (C.A. 11106/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 11106/2025

Case Record

C.A. 11106/2025

AMAR TANDON Versus GURMAIL SINGH SAINI AND ORS.

REGISTRAR

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Contractual Obligations Delay

13 PDF renditions· 13 distinct judicial orders· 13 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

ITEM NO.804 COURT NO.10 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11106/2025 AMAR TANDON Versus GURMAIL SINGH SAINI & ORS.. C.A. 11106/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010245242024. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 13 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 11 July 2024 to 7 September 2026.

On 11 July 2024 the order records: Delay condoned. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that when the relief of specific performance was rejected, the natural consequence was for order of refund of the advance.
On 4 October 2024 the order records: Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 to 3. Ld. Advocate-on-record, Mr. Gopal Jha appears for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Four weeks' time is granted to do so.
On 17 January 2025 the order records: Service is complete on respondent No.4, there is no appearance. It has been submitted by Ld. Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 that counter affidavit has already been filed today itself.
On 28 November 2025 the order records: Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent No.4 but none has entered appearance.
On 15 January 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented and counter affidavit has already been filed. Service was complete on respondent No.4 on 29.07.2024, but none has entered appearance.
On 12 February 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented and counter affidavit has already been filed by the said respondents. Service was complete on respondent No.4 on 29.7.2024, but none has entered appearance.
On 18 March 2026 the order records: Ld. Advocate, Mr.Umesh Kumar Yadav, appearing on behalf of Mr.Gopal Jha, Advocate-on-record has entered appearance for respondent No.4 on whom service was complete on 29.07.2024. It has been submitted by the Ld. counsel that vakalatnama and counter affidavit have already been filed. Registry to verify and update the re
On 22 April 2026 the order records: Respondent nos. 1 to 3 are duly represented. Counter affidavit has already been filed. Service was complete on respondent no.4 on 29.07.2024 but none has entered appearance. It has been submitted by the ld. Advocate on-record, Mr Gopal Jha that inadvertently on the last date of hearing it was submitted that he is appea

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

11 July 2024. Delay condoned. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that when the relief of specific performance was rejected, the natural consequence was for order of refund of the advance.
4 October 2024. Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 to 3. Ld. Advocate-on-record, Mr. Gopal Jha appears for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Four weeks' time is granted to do so.
17 January 2025. Service is complete on respondent No.4, there is no appearance. It has been submitted by Ld. Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 that counter affidavit has already been filed today itself.
20 May 2025. List the matter in 4th week of July, 2025. (KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (SAPNA BANSAL) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
25 July 2025. List on 29th July, 2025. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (AKSHAY KUMAR BHORIA) AR-CUM-PS
29 July 2025. List on 22.08.2025.
22 August 2025. 1. Leave granted. 2. Let the record of the court below be called for.
28 November 2025. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent No.4 but none has entered appearance.
15 January 2026. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented and counter affidavit has already been filed. Service was complete on respondent No.4 on 29.07.2024, but none has entered appearance.
12 February 2026. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented and counter affidavit has already been filed by the said respondents. Service was complete on respondent No.4 on 29.7.2024, but none has entered appearance.
18 March 2026. Ld. Advocate, Mr.Umesh Kumar Yadav, appearing on behalf of Mr.Gopal Jha, Advocate-on-record has entered appearance for respondent No.4 on whom service was complete on 29.07.2024. It has been submitted by the Ld. counsel that vakalatnama and counter affidavit have already been filed. Registry to verify and update the re
22 April 2026. Respondent nos. 1 to 3 are duly represented. Counter affidavit has already been filed. Service was complete on respondent no.4 on 29.07.2024 but none has entered appearance. It has been submitted by the ld. Advocate on-record, Mr Gopal Jha that inadvertently on the last date of hearing it was submitted that he is appea
7 September 2026. 1. No one appears to press the mentioning. 2. Rejected.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Mr. Keshav Bansal, Mr. Tarun Meel, Mr. Partik, Mr. Partik Ahalawat, Mr. Devansh Khatter, Mr. Ashutosh Mahendrou, Mr. Nikhil Kumar, Mr. Mayank Dubey, Mr. Partik Ahlawat, Mr. Puneet Dewan, Mr. Rohit Dhamija Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Gopal Jha, Mr. Chandrkant Reddy, Mr. Shreyash Bhardwaj, Mr. Nimish Arjaria, Ms. Priyanshi Goel, Mr. Mani Ranjan Suman, Ms. Shireesha Sharma, Mr. Sawan Datta, Mr. Suresh Shambhuprasad Kanojia, Mr. Amit Chandramohan Jha, Mr. Umesh Kumar Yadav

Relief Sought & Granted

On 7 September 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. No one appears to press the mentioning. 2. Rejected.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Contractual Obligations Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 7 Sept 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 7 Sept 2026

Next hearing

28 Nov 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 13 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.