ALL INDIA SALT DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES UNION III BOMBAY UNIT AND ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV [R-1] (C.A. 2128/2024)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 2128/2024

Case Record

C.A. 2128/2024

ALL INDIA SALT DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES UNION III BOMBAY UNIT AND ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV [R-1]

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

12 PDF renditions· 12 distinct judicial orders· 12 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

ALL INDIA SALT DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES UNION BOMBAY UNIT & ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. C.A. 2128/2024 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010247262018. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 12 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 6 August 2018 to 20 April 2026.

On 6 August 2018 the order records: Application for deleting the name of respondent is allowed at the risk of the petitioners. Issue notice.
On 28 September 2018 the order records: As per the track report of India Post, the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have been served but there is no appearance on their behalf so far. However, the service report qua respondent No.3 be awaited.
On 29 November 2018 the order records: Service of notice is complete qua respondent Nos.1 to 3 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, Mr. H.K. Naik, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.
On 30 January 2019 the order records: Four weeks' time, as a last chance, is given to respondent No.1 to file counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 seeks and is given four weeks' time to file counter affidavit.
On 28 March 2019 the order records: Respondent Nos.1-3 have already filed counter affidavit. Name of respondent No.4 has been deleted by order dated 06.08.2018 of the Hon'ble Court.
On 24 July 2023 the order records: On being mentioned, we are of the view that no order is required to be passed in respect of early listing plea.
On 4 September 2024 the order records: Upon being mentioned by the learned counsel for the appellant(s), list on 17.10.2024.
On 20 April 2026 the order records: IA No. 22388/2026 1. List the appeal for hearing in the week commencing 12.10.2026 before an appropriate Bench. 2. IA No. 22388/2026 stands disposed of accordingly.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

6 August 2018. Application for deleting the name of respondent is allowed at the risk of the petitioners. Issue notice.
28 September 2018. As per the track report of India Post, the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have been served but there is no appearance on their behalf so far. However, the service report qua respondent No.3 be awaited.
29 November 2018. Service of notice is complete qua respondent Nos.1 to 3 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, Mr. H.K. Naik, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.
30 January 2019. Four weeks' time, as a last chance, is given to respondent No.1 to file counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 seeks and is given four weeks' time to file counter affidavit.
28 March 2019. Respondent Nos.1-3 have already filed counter affidavit. Name of respondent No.4 has been deleted by order dated 06.08.2018 of the Hon'ble Court.
28 February 2022. List the matter on a non-miscellaneous day after three months.
20 July 2022. List in due course.
11 October 2022. As prayed, matter is adjourned. List after eight weeks.
24 July 2023. On being mentioned, we are of the view that no order is required to be passed in respect of early listing plea.
6 February 2024. As pleadings are complete, leave be granted. List on 24.07.2024.
4 September 2024. Upon being mentioned by the learned counsel for the appellant(s), list on 17.10.2024.
20 April 2026. IA No. 22388/2026 1. List the appeal for hearing in the week commencing 12.10.2026 before an appropriate Bench. 2. IA No. 22388/2026 stands disposed of accordingly.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Ms. Rekha Pandey, Ms. Smriti Kumari, Mrs. Rekha Pandey, Mr. Raghav Pandey, Ms. Gauri Kumar, Mr. Shiv Prakash Pandey, Mr. R.S. Nagar, Mr. A.K. Singh, Ms. Gauri Pandey, Ms. Sharmistha Choudhury, Mr. Ritesh Kumar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. H.K. Naik, Ms. Anil Katiyar, Mr. A.K. Kaul, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Mr. Anukalp Jain, Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Mr. Chinmayee Chandra, Ms. Sunita Sharma, Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Mr. Amrish Kumar, Mr. Raj Bahadur

Relief Sought & Granted

On 20 April 2026 the latest order on this record says: IA No. 22388/2026 1. List the appeal for hearing in the week commencing 12.10.2026 before an appropriate Bench. 2. IA No. 22388/2026 stands disposed of accordingly.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 20 Apr 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 20 Apr 2026

Next hearing

20 Apr 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 12 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.