ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION III (AICTE) Versus KARAMAVEER BHAURAO PATIL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL AND ORS. (C.A. 14679/2015)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 14679/2015

Case Record

C.A. 14679/2015

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION III (AICTE) Versus KARAMAVEER BHAURAO PATIL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL AND ORS.

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Education

21 PDF renditions· 21 distinct judicial orders· 18 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION (AICTE) Versus KARAMAVEER BHAURAO PATIL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL & ORS.. C.A. 14679/2015 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010378292015. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 18 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 4 July 2016 to 27 May 2026.

On 4 July 2016 the order records: Await certificate of service in respect of the respondents. Reminder be issued.
On 6 May 2019 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to file spare copies in some of the matters within two weeks time else action will be taken under Order V Rule 1(29). If spare copies are filed, notices be issued. Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of some respondents in some matters. Reminder be issued.
On 27 August 2019 the order records: Respondent no.1 in C.A. No.507, 508, 509 and 516 of 2017, respondent nos. 1 and 3 in C.A. No. 6355/2016, respondent no.2 in C.A. No. 6356/2016, C.A. No. 6514/2016 and respondent no.3 in C.A. No. 6357/2016 are duly represented. matters. Await response to the High Court in SLP(C) No.
On 10 February 2023 the order records: Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent no.1 in C.A. No. 5226/2016 and unserved respondent nos. 2 in C.A. No. 5227/2016. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 to 4 in C.A. No.
On 29 March 2023 the order records: Ld. counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time as final opportunity to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent no.4. Respondent no.3 is granted four weeks' time as final opportunity for filing counter affidavit.
On 11 May 2023 the order records: Respondent no.3 has failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined. Respondent no. 1 has failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined.
On 22 February 2024 the order records: Mr. Sourav Singh, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner(s), seeks some more time to effect service of notice upon unserved respondent No. 4. Needful shall be done without fail before the next date of hearing.
On 27 May 2026 the order records: disposed of as infructuous in terms of the signed order, which is placed on file. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

4 July 2016. Await certificate of service in respect of the respondents. Reminder be issued.
31 August 2016. Respondent no. 1 is duly represented. None appears for respondent nos. 2 to 4 despite due service.
6 May 2019. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to file spare copies in some of the matters within two weeks time else action will be taken under Order V Rule 1(29). If spare copies are filed, notices be issued. Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of some respondents in some matters. Reminder be issued.
27 August 2019. Respondent no.1 in C.A. No.507, 508, 509 and 516 of 2017, respondent nos. 1 and 3 in C.A. No. 6355/2016, respondent no.2 in C.A. No. 6356/2016, C.A. No. 6514/2016 and respondent no.3 in C.A. No. 6357/2016 are duly represented. matters. Await response to the High Court in SLP(C) No.
18 December 2019. Learned counsel for the Appellants prays for and is granted ten days time to file spare copy for service on respondent nos. 1 & 3 to 6. List after six weeks.
31 January 2020. CA 554/16, 5224/16, 5225/16, 5226/16 AND 5227/16 Learned counsel for the appellant(s) in C.A. No.554/2016 and 5225/2016 has prayed for and is granted two weeks' time to file spare copies for service on the unserved respondents. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (KAMLESH RAWAT) AR.-CUM-P.S.
20 February 2020. Perused Office Report dated 18.02.2020. Learned counsel for the appellant-AICTE has filed spare copies for issue of NLPA to the concerned High Court.
17 February 2021. Two weeks' time granted, as last and final opportunity, to learned counsel for the appellant for filing spare copies for service upon unserved respondent nos. 1, 4 and 6.
10 February 2023. Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent no.1 in C.A. No. 5226/2016 and unserved respondent nos. 2 in C.A. No. 5227/2016. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 to 4 in C.A. No.
29 March 2023. Ld. counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time as final opportunity to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent no.4. Respondent no.3 is granted four weeks' time as final opportunity for filing counter affidavit.
11 May 2023. Respondent no.3 has failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined. Respondent no. 1 has failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined.
24 November 2023. Counsel for the petitioner seeks a week's time to file an appropriate application explaining why the steps could not be taken within time and why the time granted for the purpose be extended. (KRITIKA TIWARI) (RAM SUBHAG SINGH) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
22 February 2024. Mr. Sourav Singh, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner(s), seeks some more time to effect service of notice upon unserved respondent No. 4. Needful shall be done without fail before the next date of hearing.
10 April 2024. Today also, learned counsel for the appellant(s)/petitioner(s) prays for time to comply with the earlier order. Four weeks' time is granted as prayed for.
12 August 2024. 1. SLP(C) No.13322/2016, C.A. No.5227/2016 and C.A. No. 5226/2016 Dr. Ravindra Chingale, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners-State of Maharashtra submits that they in the process of obtaining the addresses of respondent No.4 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.13322 of 2016. respondent No.2 in Special Leave Peti
4 October 2024. The petitioner(s) in SLP (C) no.13322/2016 is granted two weeks time finally for furnishing fresh address of the respondent no.4 for effecting service of notice. The respondent(s) in C.A.No.5227/2016 is granted two weeks time to file counter affidavit in the matter, failing which the matter be listed before the regular
19 November 2024. Service is complete. List the matter before the regular Bench.
27 May 2026. disposed of as infructuous in terms of the signed order, which is placed on file. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, Mr. G. Sivabalamurgan, Mr Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Mr. Harish Pandey, Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Mr. Sachin Patil, Mr. Anil Soni, Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Binisa Mohanty, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Geo Joseph Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Mrityunjai Singh, Mr. Chandra Prakash, Mr. Brij Kishor Sah, Mr. Prateek Dhir, Ms Nidhi Mittal, Ms Divya Nair, Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Mr. Harish Pandey, Ms Priyansha Indra Sharma, Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Sinha, Mr Brij Kishor Sah

Relief Sought & Granted

On 27 May 2026 the latest order on this record says: disposed of as infructuous in terms of the signed order, which is placed on file. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Education

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 27 May 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 27 May 2026

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 18 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.