- 13 August 2013. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 7 February 2014. We are sorry to note that in spite of specific directions by this Court on 13.08.2013 to complete the inquiry within three months, no concrete steps have been taken by the respondents so far. Application for extension of time was filed as early as in December, 2013 which is moved today only.
- 28 February 2014. Post this I.A. along with I.A. No.7 on 24.03.3014. |(Narendra Prasad) | |(Renuka Sadana) | |
- 14 March 2014. Post on 24.03.2014 along with I.A. Nos.6 & 7. |(Narendra Prasad) | |(Renuka Sadana) | |
- 24 March 2014. IA No.8 is allowed. Put up on April 28, 2014.
- 25 April 2014. Let the IA be listed on April 28, 2014 along with IA Nos. 6 and 7 which are already listed.
- 28 April 2014. IA Nos. 6 & 7 Copies of the Report submitted by Mr. Rakesh K. Khanna, learned Additional Solicitor General, be made available to Mr. M.L. Lahoty, Advocate and the party appearing in-person.
- 5 May 2014. Put up along with the Civil Appeal, which is stated to be listed as Item No.1 in the Cause List for May 07, (N.S.K. Kamesh) (Renuka Sadana)
- 7 May 2014. Mr. R.K. Khanna, learned ASG, appearing for the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has sought permission to constitute another Committee, since there are two conflicting Reports on the issue, directed to be examined by this Court in its judgment reported in 2014 (1) SCC 769. We have gone through both the Report
- 7 May 2014. Mr. R.K. Khanna, learned ASG, appearing for the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has sought permission to constitute another Committee, since there are two conflicting Reports on the issue, directed to be examined by this Court in its judgment reported in 2014 (1) SCC 769. We have gone through both the Report
- 13 May 2014. List the I.A.No......of 2014 (Application for modification of order dated 7.5.2014) on Monday the 19th May, 2014.
- 13 May 2014. List the I.A.No......of 2014 (Application for modification of order dated 7.5.2014) on Monday the 19th May, 2014.
- 19 May 2014. List before the Bench of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikramjit Sen in the summer vacation on 16.6.2014.
- 19 May 2014. List before the Bench of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikramjit Sen in the summer vacation on 16.6.2014.
- 16 June 2014. Issue notice, returnable on 22nd July, 2014.
- 22 July 2014. List on 12th August, 2014. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS (
- 12 August 2014. intervention/impleadment are allowed. The applicants would be arrayed as parties. submitted by Mr. Sundaram and Mr. Vivek Tankha learned senior counsel appearing for applicants Energy Development Corporation Ltd. that it is not covered by the decision of this Court in Alaknanada Hydropower Company Ltd. vs. Anuj Joshi &
- 9 October 2014. Despite our order dated 12th August, 2014, the Union of India has not filed the requisite report. However, a copy of the same which is partial in nature, has been handed over to us. Paragraph 11(i) of the said report, reads as follows: "(i) These 24 projects, including those for EC have been granted and HEPs and the pr
- 5 November 2014. This Court on 9th October, 2014, having heard learned counsel for the parties, had passed an order covering many a spectrum. The relevant portion of the said order is reproduced below: "It is urged by them that they are prepared to have a preliminary meeting with the competent authorities of Ministry of Environment & F
- 9 December 2014. In pursuance of our earlier order, Mr. Suri, learned senior counsel appearing for Union of India has filed an affidavit. Learned counsel for the respondents have argued on the affidavit contending, inter alia, that there has been violation of the order by this Court, for the MoEF has not given the report on project spe
- 9 December 2014. In pursuance of our earlier order, Mr. Suri, learned senior counsel appearing for Union of India has filed an affidavit. Learned counsel for the respondents have argued on the affidavit contending, inter alia, that there has been violation of the order by this Court, for the MoEF has not given the report on project spe
- 9 December 2014. In pursuance of our earlier order, Mr. Suri, learned senior counsel appearing for Union of India has filed an affidavit. Learned counsel for the respondents have argued on the affidavit contending, inter alia, that there has been violation of the order by this Court, for the MoEF has not given the report on project spe
- 17 February 2015. This Court on 16th December, 2014, had passed the following order: "Heard Mr. Rohatgi, learned Attorney General for India along with Mr. Narsimha, learned Additional Solicitor General. Regard being had to the previous order, it is directed that the cases of six project proponents, namely, NTPC, NHPC, THDC, GMR and two
- 12 March 2015. It is submitted by Mr. Narsimha, learned Additional Solicitor General that the Union of India intends to file a comprehensive affidavit with regard to these projects which had been enumerated on earlier order. Needless to say that the comprehensive affidavit should contain as an annexure the report of the recent Expert
- 13 April 2015. Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, learned Attorney General appearing for Union of India, submitted that keeping in view the orders passed by this Court on 5.11.2014, 10.12.2014, 16.12.2014 and 17.2.2015, the Union of India would file a comprehensive affidavit by 29.04.2015. Reply to the same, if any, be filed within three days theref
- 5 May 2015. 35 & 36/2014 in Civil Appeal No.6736 of 2013 Mr. Narsimha, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for Union of India, submitted that the Union of India shall file the affidavit as directed by this Court on earlier occasion positively by 11.05.2015. At this juncture, it is submitted by Mr. Sundaram and Mr.
- 12 May 2015. On 5th May, 2015, this Court had passed the following order: "Mr. Narsimha, learned Aditional Solicitor General appearing for Union of India, submitted that the Union of India shall file the affidavit as directed by this Court on earlier occasion positively by 11.05.2015.
- 1 October 2015. On mentioning, the matter is taken on Board. List the matter on 12th October, 2015, along with Contempt Petition (C) No.245 of 2014.
- 12 October 2015. This Court on 12.05.2015, after referring to its order dated 05.05.2015 reproduced the relevant part of the affidavit filed by the Ministry of Environment and Forests and Climate Change and noted the submissions of Mr. Amarendera Sharan, learned senior counsel for the State of Uttarakhand, Mr. Vikas Singh and Mr. Dhruv
- 24 November 2015. In pursuance of our order, the report dated 19.10.2015 has been filed. The said report has been supported by an affidavit sworn by the competent authority. Mr. Colin Gonsalves, learned senior counsel, Mr. Prashant Bhushan and Mr. Sanjay Parekh, learned counsel shall file their objections on behalf of their respective c
- The record also contains 24 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Mr. M.L. Lahoty, Mr. Paban K. Sharma, Mrs. Santosh Singh, Ms. Gargi B. Bharati, Mr. Rakesh K. Khanna, Mr. S.N. Terdal, Mr. Praban KJ. Sharma, Ms. Gasrgi B. Bharali, Mr. D. Kumaran, Dr. Sanjay Shukla Advocates — Respondents: Mrs. Santosh Singh, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Mr. Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan, Ms. Ranjana Narayan, Ms. S.K. Bajwa, Mr. S.N. Terdal, Mr. V. Giri, Mr. Saurav Agrawal, Ms. Sangeeta Mandal, Mr. Aditya Bharech
