AKON BORA Versus ATUL BORA (C.A. 6140/2010)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 6140/2010

Case Record

C.A. 6140/2010

AKON BORA Versus ATUL BORA

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

16 PDF renditions· 16 distinct judicial orders· 12 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 6140/2010 AKON BORA Versus ATUL BORA. C.A. 6140/2010 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010238942010. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 12 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 4 August 2010 to 28 January 2026.

On 4 August 2010 the order records: List this matter on 13th August, 2010. Till then, there will be stay of the final order of the High Court.
On 13 August 2010 the order records: Issue notice in the Civil Appeal, returnable four weeks hence. The stay granted on 4th August, 2010, will continue in the meantime.
On 25 November 2010 the order records: Issue fresh notice upon the unserved respondents. Dasti service upon the unserved respondents is allowed, permitted to be served through nearest civil court or trial coaurt which can affix the notice if it could not be served in due course.
On 14 July 2011 the order records: Ld.counsel for the appellant has not filed statement of cases in spite of notice dated 4.02.2011. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for appropriate orders.
On 3 January 2012 the order records: Sole respondent has been served. No appearance for the respondent. Original records have been received. Appellant has filed statement of case. It is submitted that no further steps are required. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Court, as per Rule.
On 29 July 2016 the order records: None appears for the sole respondent, despite due service. Appellant has not filed the statement of case.
On 3 October 2024 the order records: For the reasons assigned, application i.e., I.A.No.188350/ 2024 for intervention, stands allowed. Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks.
On 28 January 2026 the order records: 1. The Civil Appeal is dismissed as infructuous in terms of the signed order. 2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

4 August 2010. List this matter on 13th August, 2010. Till then, there will be stay of the final order of the High Court.
13 August 2010. Issue notice in the Civil Appeal, returnable four weeks hence. The stay granted on 4th August, 2010, will continue in the meantime.
25 November 2010. Issue fresh notice upon the unserved respondents. Dasti service upon the unserved respondents is allowed, permitted to be served through nearest civil court or trial coaurt which can affix the notice if it could not be served in due course.
21 January 2011. Deleted. (M.K.HANJURA) REGISTRAR rd
14 July 2011. Ld.counsel for the appellant has not filed statement of cases in spite of notice dated 4.02.2011. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for appropriate orders.
3 January 2012. Sole respondent has been served. No appearance for the respondent. Original records have been received. Appellant has filed statement of case. It is submitted that no further steps are required. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Court, as per Rule.
19 September 2014. List the matter for hearing within four months.
1 July 2015. At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, call the matter after two weeks.
10 August 2015. Appeal is admitted. [KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR]
29 July 2016. None appears for the sole respondent, despite due service. Appellant has not filed the statement of case.
3 October 2024. For the reasons assigned, application i.e., I.A.No.188350/ 2024 for intervention, stands allowed. Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks.
28 January 2026. 1. The Civil Appeal is dismissed as infructuous in terms of the signed order. 2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. P.P. Rao, Mr. Aman Lekhi, Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi, Mr. Vishal Balecha, Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Mr. Dinesh Rastogi, Mr. Saran Chachra, Mr. Shyam Nandan, Ms. Carishma Sehgal, Mr. Rajiv Dalal, Ms. Meha Agarwal, Mr. Abhay Kumar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Dipesh Sinha, Ms. Pallavi Barua, Ms. Aparna Singh

Relief Sought & Granted

On 28 January 2026 the order records: The Civil Appeal is dismissed as infructuous in terms of the signed order.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 28 Jan 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 28 Jan 2026

Final disposition

The Civil Appeal is dismissed as infructuous in terms of the signed order.

Important procedural note

Written only from 12 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.