- 30 September 2024. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Issue notice, returnable in four weeks.
- 25 November 2024. 1. Leave granted. 2. During the pendency of the appeal, we are inclined to suspend the sentence of the appellant.
- 28 January 2025. Sole respondent has already filed counter affidavit. Original records of High Court and Trial Court have not been received yet. Let a reminder be issued.
- 28 February 2025. Counter affidavit has already been filed by sole respondent. Original records of High Court and Trial Court have not been received. A letter in this regard has been received from High Court stating therein that translation of records is under process and the records would be sent as early as possible. Hence, records ar
- 21 March 2025. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted.
- 23 April 2025. Sole respondent has filed counter affidavit. Scanned soft copies of Original records of High Court as well as Trial Court have not been received yet. A letter from the High Court has been received stating therein that the translation of the records is under process. Let copy of the original records be awaited. Let a re
- 2 May 2025. 1. Taking into consideration that this Court has already granted suspension of sentence in respect of the other co-accused, the prayer for suspension of sentence in these appeals is also allowed. 2. Therefore, the sentence imposed upon the appellants herein is suspended during the pendency of the appeals before this Co
- 8 May 2025. Both matters Sole respondent has filed counter affidavit. Scanned soft copies of original records from High Court and Trial Court are still awaited. Let a reminder be issued.
- 5 August 2025. Both matters Reply has already been filed by the sole respondent. Scanned soft copies of original records of High Court and Trial Court have not been received yet, despite reminder. Hence, D.O. letter be issued.
- 15 September 2025. Both matters Sole respondent has already filed reply. Scanned copies of the Original records of High Court and Trial Court have been received and as per office report, soft copies of the same have been provided to the Ld. counsels for both the parties through e-mail.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, Mr. Abhay Singh, Ms. Ankita Agarwal, Mr. Sanket Vashistha, Ms. Samridhi Srivastava, Mr. Snehil Shukla, Mr. A.Sirajudeen, Mr. Naresh Kumar, Ms. Shaik Soni Ahamed, Mr. A. Sirajudeen, Mr. Avinash Kumar Jain, Mr. Manoj Kumar Rajput Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Vikrant Bais, Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Mr. Prashant Kumar Umrao, Ms. Prabha Singh, Ms. Ayushi Pandey, Mr. Atul Jha
