AHILYABAI AND ORS. Versus SHIVAYOGI AND ORS. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR [R-1], ITEM ] (C.A. 10909/2016)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 10909/2016

Case Record

C.A. 10909/2016

AHILYABAI AND ORS. Versus SHIVAYOGI AND ORS. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR [R-1], ITEM ]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI · HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI

C.A.Speed up proceedings Civil appeals

24 PDF renditions· 24 distinct judicial orders· 9 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

AHILYABAI & ORS. Versus SHIVAYOGI & ORS.. C.A. 10909/2016 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010417502014. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 9 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 18 April 2018 to 19 February 2026.

On 18 April 2018 the order records: On mentioning, the matter is taken on Board. List the matter next week before the appropriate Bench as per the roster.
On 27 April 2018 the order records: This is an application for early hearing of the Having heard learned counsel for the applicant, we are not inclined to allow the prayer. However, liberty to the applicant is granted to file an appropriate application for early hearing of the matter, after six months.
On 24 February 2020 the order records: IA No(s).5834/2020,5835/2020,5837/2020 & 5839/2020 : Abatement is set aside.
On 3 February 2021 the order records: Respondent nos. 8(i) and 8(ii) are duly represented. Remaining respondents are served/duly represented.
On 12 May 2022 the order records: Respondent nos. 1,6,7,8(i), 8(ii), 9 and 10 are duly represented. Despite due service no one has entered appearance on behalf of respondent nos.5 and 11 to 30.
On 11 August 2022 the order records: Ld. counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted two' weeks' time as final opportunity to file fresh particulars in respect of service of notice for alternative arrangement(counsel designated as Senior Advocate) upon unserved respondent nos.2 and 3. List on 19.9.2022.
On 30 January 2023 the order records: Respondent nos. 1 to 4, 6,7,8(i-ii), 9 and 10 are duly represented. Item no.26 Service is complete on respondent nos. 5 and 11 to 30 but none has entered appearance.
On 19 February 2026 the order records: IA No. 115350/2025 No ground to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

18 April 2018. On mentioning, the matter is taken on Board. List the matter next week before the appropriate Bench as per the roster.
27 April 2018. This is an application for early hearing of the Having heard learned counsel for the applicant, we are not inclined to allow the prayer. However, liberty to the applicant is granted to file an appropriate application for early hearing of the matter, after six months.
29 April 2019. No order for early hearing of the appeal is called for at this stage. The application is accordingly dismissed.
24 February 2020. IA No(s).5834/2020,5835/2020,5837/2020 & 5839/2020 : Abatement is set aside.
3 February 2021. Respondent nos. 8(i) and 8(ii) are duly represented. Remaining respondents are served/duly represented.
12 May 2022. Respondent nos. 1,6,7,8(i), 8(ii), 9 and 10 are duly represented. Despite due service no one has entered appearance on behalf of respondent nos.5 and 11 to 30.
11 August 2022. Ld. counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted two' weeks' time as final opportunity to file fresh particulars in respect of service of notice for alternative arrangement(counsel designated as Senior Advocate) upon unserved respondent nos.2 and 3. List on 19.9.2022.
30 January 2023. Respondent nos. 1 to 4, 6,7,8(i-ii), 9 and 10 are duly represented. Item no.26 Service is complete on respondent nos. 5 and 11 to 30 but none has entered appearance.
19 February 2026. IA No. 115350/2025 No ground to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Mr. Sudhanshu Prakash, Mr. Chinmay Deshpandy, Ms. Rachitha Hiremath, Mr. Kartik Anand, Mr Pratik Samajpati, Ms Neha Jain, Mr Ranjan Parmar, Mr Vinayaka, Mr Rajan Parmar, Mr. Vinayaka, Mr. Vaibhav Sabharwal Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Aparna Jha, Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, Mr. S. N. Bhat, Mr. Anil V. Katarki, Mr. Anil Nishani, Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Mr. S.N. Bhat, Mr. Priyank Jain, Mr. Vijay Kumar, Mr. Mustafa A. Khan, Mr. Anil C. Nishani, Mr. D.P. Chaturvedi

Relief Sought & Granted

On 19 February 2026 the latest order on this record says: IA No. 115350/2025 No ground to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Speed up proceedings Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 19 Feb 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 19 Feb 2026

Next hearing

19 Feb 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 9 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 4 other files in the folder were left out.